Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Forensic Scientists present more evidence in Day 5 of Tara baker Trials

A man in a suit sits at the stand holding papers during courtroom testimony.
ACC Unified Government
Feb 6, 2026 - Larry Peterson, who worked at the Georgia Bureau of Investigation Crime Lab as a hair analyst at the time of the initial investigation into Tara Baker's death, testified about the process and review of hair samples found on the scene of the crime.

Day 5 of the trial in the 2001 killing of University of Georgia student Tara Baker proceeded Friday as prosecution called cold case investigators to the stand to admit more items as evidence in the prosecution of Edrick Faust.

Larry Peterson, who worked at the Georgia Bureau of Investigation Crime Lab as a hair analyst at the time of the initial investigation, testified about the process and review of hair samples found on the scene of the crime.

Marissa Licon, a forensic scientist at private DNA testing lab Pure Gold was questioned about oral and vaginal swabs received from the GBI in 2024 for serology testing. These items were also admitted as evidence.

Headbutting continued between defense attorney Ahmad Cruz and Superior Court Judge Lisa Lott as Cruz asked to amend the defense’s witness list after “bumping in” to a witness in the courthouse who he couldn’t reach prior to the trial.

Judge Lott denied his request underscoring that the witnesses name could have been added to the list prior to the trial even though they hadn’t made contact, and that the jury had already been asked if they were related by blood or marriage to any of the witnesses and it was too late to ask the question again in regards to Cruz’s proposed witness.

State prosecution also brought up a section of the defense's report which listed up a suspect who was neither Edrick Faust nor Chris Melton, Baker's boyfriend who was a suspect in the initial 2001 investigation. The prosecution requested it be redacted, as it would be confusing to the jury. Judge Lott concurred that the defense did not follow the legal procedure to get the permission to talk about other suspects, and ordered the state to redact the statements which regarded irrelevant suspects.

The trial is scheduled to proceed through Monday, Feb. 7. The defense has yet to begin presenting its case.

Related Content